Estate Planning

Eight Common Estate Planning Objectives Of Married Couples

As the previous posts demonstrate, estate planners still struggle with how to structure estate plans for married couples in order to accomplish both the tax and nontax objectives of such couples. Introducing the portability election into the arena has only made such choices even more varied. If you asked 10 different […] Read...

So You Have Been Named Executor of An Estate – What Does It Mean?

An executor is a person named by a Will in charge of wrapping up the decedent’s estate and making sure that the wishes of the decedent are followed. Often, people name close friends or relatives as executors of their estate, reflecting on that person’s trustworthiness, reliability, and managerial ability. People named as an executor frequently feel a sense of validation or honor at their designation, recognizing that it is a big deal to be left in charge of someone’s Will—but perhaps not recognizing the staggering amount of responsibilities and potential liability that accompany this distinction. An executor’s duties are imposed upon them by the probate code, and though the task of concluding an estate seems simple on the surface, it can be fraught with complications. The marquee duty of an executor is known as a “fiduciary duty,” meaning that the executor must act honestly, in good faith, and in the best interest of the beneficiaries of the estate. Any breach of these duties may expose an executor to personal liability if the beneficiaries choose to sue—something few executors expect. A typical estate, without any complications, can still take up to one year or more to conclude. During this time, an executor can expect to doing the following: Paying debts of the Estate Paying taxes due by the Estate Distributing assets to beneficiaries Creating and managing Estate accounts for handling expenses File the Will with the probate court, follow filing deadlines and instructions, notifying beneficiaries and named parties It is important to distinguish the role of an executor from that of a trustee. A trustee is a different type of...

Estate Planning News – Undue Influence Update -May 5th, 2014

[wp_lightbox_prettyPhoto_video link=”https://vimeo.com/57999385″ description=”Undue Influence” source=”https://smartestateplans.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ui.png” title=”Undue Influence”] In this week’s edition of Estate Planning News, we’re highlighting legislative changes affecting an important elder law offense: Undue Influence. As the selected pieces linked below point out, the key features of this law change is broadening the class of people who are able to commit the offense and the time frame when it can occur. Under previous iterations of the statute, undue influence was limited to testamentary actions (such as gifts in a will or trust), and required a specialized relationship between the elder and the abuser. The new version of the law accounts for actions that steer seniors toward parting with their property during their lifetimes, even without a confidential relationship being present. Read the articles to learn more!   Bill Text – Assembly Bill No. 140 CHAPTER 668 Existing law provides that financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult occurs when, among other instances, a person or entity takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains, or assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining, real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult by undue influence, as defined. Read More at http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB140 Estate Planning: Financial elder abuse and undue influence DENNIS FORDHAM On Jan. 1, 2014, California amended its statutory definition of “undue influence” in section 15610.70 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. This new definition of “undue influence” applies both to “financial elder abuse” that affects the victim while alive and also to undue influence that affect the victim’s “testamentary dispositions” after death. Read More at...

Estate Planning News – April 22nd, 2014 – IRA Inheritance

In this week’s Estate Planning News, our firm has highlighted the oft-overlooked area of Estate Planning and IRAs. We chose three articles that explain different IRA planning strategies, ideas, and perspectives on how IRAs can and should be used in an Estate Plan. Retirement accounts, in general, are governed by strict regulation and need to be handled carefully by well-informed parties. This digest should arm readers with information to adequately discuss their plans with a qualified professional. If You Are the Surviving Spouse of an IRA Owner – Fidelity.com If you are the spouse of an IRA owner who has named you as his or her beneficiary, it’s critical that you-and the owner of the IRA-understand the rules that govern IRA inheritances. Read More at https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/retirement/surviving-spouse-IRA Ed Slott and Company – IRA, Tax, Retirement Planning Articles, Insight Previously, same sex married couples did not have the spousal IRA benefits of opposite-sex married couples under the tax code. These benefits include the ability to make spousal IRA contributions, tax-free splitting of IRAs in a divorce, and spousal rollovers at death. However, the IRS recently issued guidance that gives same-sex married couples the spousal IRA benefits. Read More at http://www.theslottreport.com/2013/09/spousal-ira-rollovers-for-same-sex.html Understanding Who Should Be Beneficiary of Your IRA How To Turn A Modest Tax-Deferred Account Into Millions For Your Family How would you like to turn your modest tax-deferred account into millions for your family? Depending on whom you name as beneficiary, you can keep this money growing tax-deferred for not only your and your spouse’s lifetimes, but also for your children’s or grandchildren’s lifetimes. Read More at...

IRS Notice 2014-19: Further Recognition for Same-Sex Married Couples

As we have discussed in previous posts, the impact of the United States v. Windsor case has been broad. This landmark ruling invalidated provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act, paving the way for recognition of same-sex marriages when it comes to federal tax purposes. Earlier this month, the IRS issued Notice 2014-19, expanding the reach of Windsor to federally qualified retirement plans. Prior to this ruling, there was little clarity regarding the IRS’s position on whether same-sex spouses were considered “spouses” in the eyes of a qualified plan—especially in states that do not currently recognize same-sex marriages. Notice 2014-19 dispels any confusion: flatly stating that as far as the IRS is concerned, same-sex spouses are covered by the benefits afforded heterosexual spouses by these retirement plans. Plans that do not currently cover same-sex married spouses will need to be amended to reflect the new, federal guidelines enacted by this notice. Benefits that are now extended to same-sex spouses include survivor annuities, payment of benefits after the death of a spouse, and some employee stock ownership privileges. The Notice also refreshes the reader’s memory about how a same-sex marriage can be recognized by the federal government, stating that the IRS: “adopts a general rule recognizing a marriage of same-sex individuals that was validly entered into in a state whose laws authorize the marriage of two individuals of the same sex even if the married couple is domiciled in a state that does not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages.” This is a comparison of the two ways same-sex marriages are either recognized or disregarded, the “state of celebration” approach...